1. The informant has filed this information under section 19(1) (a) of the Competition Act against Opposite Party with a prayer that the Commission should pass orders:-

(i) Directing the OP to "cease & desist" from indulging in abusive conduct;

(ii) Dividing and separating the regulatory functions of the OP from the commercial aspects of the sport of cricket;

(iii) Imposing appropriate penalty on the OP for abuse of dominant position in contravention of Section 4(2)(c) and 4(2)(e) of the Act;

(iv) Grant such other reliefs as the Hon'ble Commission may deem appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

2. The Commission had considered similar information against the Opposite Party filed by one Surinder Singh Barmi and decided the matter on 8th February, 2013 as Surinder Singh Barmi v. Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI)[2013] 118 SCL 226. The Commission had considered as to what was the status of BCCI (whether it was an enterprise or not), whether BCCI abused its dominant position in the relevant market in contravention of section 4 of the Act. The Commission gave its detailed findings in this case and observed that BCCI was donning two hats one of regulator an