SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.SAMAL, N.L.LAKHANPAL, KUMAR RAJARATNAM
Ranjit Mohan Dhuru – Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinay Chauhan, Aspi Chinoy,S.K. Sen, V.N. Shingnapurkar

ORDER

N.L. Lakhanpal, Member - The appeals were taken up for final disposal through this common order with the consent of parties.

2. The appeals have been filed against the order dated 8-3-2004 passed by the respondent, Securities and Exchange Board of India, prohibiting the appellants from buying, selling or dealing in securities for a period of one year. The order has been passed by Shri G.N. Bajpai, Chairman, SEBI, in exercise of powers conferred on him under section 4(3) read with section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 11 of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995. The appellants have been charged with violation of regulation 4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995 by colluding with the ‘Ketan Parikh group entities’ in creation of artificial market and volumes in the scrip by cornering tradable securities in the market and having thereby caused artificial shortage of shares to induce investor interest in the scrip. Regulation 4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Rela

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top