SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Sultan Mir – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Ms. Syed Urfa Aijaz, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sajad A. Mir, Dy. AG

JUDGMENT

Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, J.—Application of the accused, “for taking on record the memory cards, CD and for permitting the Laptop to be played in the Court, with a further prayer to permit the petitioners to confront PW 2 with his earlier statement, as given by him to the press and media, video recording of which in CD has been presented before the trial court along with Laptop chips and certificate from the person under whose management said instruments were and have been from the time of its recording with a further prayer for directing the ETV Urdu to produce the recording of the same for cross examination of the said witness in accordance with law” has been rejected by the trial court (4th Additional sessions Judge, Srinagar) vide order dated 08.04.2015. Same is to sought to be quashed.

2. In connection with murder of one Mst. Saja, case has been registered as FIR No.24 of 2013 P/S Safa Kadal for commission of offence punishable under Sections 302, 148, 147, 447, 120-B RPC. Investigation of the case culminated in presenting challan (charge sheet). Trial court has framed charge against the accused for commission of aforesaid offences and trial of the case as such is in progres























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top