SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.RAVI KUMAR
Suvarn – Appellant
Versus
Sunkari Premeela – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vijay Kumar Heroor, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Gopala Krishnan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S. Ravi Kumar, J.—This appeal is preferred against order Dated 23.12.2008 in O.P.No.6/2002 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.

2. Appellants herein are Respondents 3 to 5 and Respondents 2 and 3 herein are Respondents 1 and 2 and first Respondent herein is petitioner in O.P.No.06/2002, which was filed under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act. Parties are hereinafter referred to as petitioner and Respondents as arrayed in O.P.No.06/2002 for better understanding and convenience.

3. According to petitioner, she is a resident of Zaheerabad and that Respondents 4 and 5 are her brother and sister born to Y. Baswanappa through his first wife late Shivamma and third respondent is second wife of Baswanappa. The claim was made in respect of term deposit amount lying in the second respondent bank and petitioner sought for succession certificate for her ¼th share in the said amount. Respondent No. 3 filed counter and the same was adopted by Respondents 4 and 5 and they resisted the claim mainly on the ground that third Respondent was a nominee for the term deposit amount in the bank and further petitioner is no longer a member of joint family having marr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top