SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, T.RAJANI
V. Pavanamanjari – Appellant
Versus
V. Manoj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. SS. Prakash, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Prithvi Sreeramaneni, Advocate

JUDGMENT

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.—This Family Court Appeal (FCA) is filed by the respondent in FCOP No.37 of 2014 on the file of the Judge, Family Court cum- V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor District (for short the Family Court), against Order and Decree, dated 31-08-2016, passed therein.

2. During the hearing of this case, we have tried to reconcile the dispute between the parties. Though the appellant has expressed her strong desire to live with the respondent, the latter was unwilling to take her back by stating that he has suffered untold miseries at her hands and that therefore, he is in no position to accept her offer. Therefore, left with no option, this Court has heard the case in order to adjudicate the case on merits.

3. The respondent filed the aforementioned OP seeking a decree of divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the Act). His averments in brief are that his marriage with the respondent was solemnized on 24-08-2008 at Thondavada Village as per the Hindu rites. Though the marriage was duly consummated, no children were born out of their wedlock. After the marriage, the appellant joined the respondent at













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top