Vipin Sanghi, J.—The present appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred as ‘HMA’) assails the judgment & decree dated 21.3.2009 passed in HMA 128/2008 by Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi, whereby the learned ADJ while allowing the petition under Section 13(1)(ia)-and (ib) of the HMA, has passed a decree of dissolution of marriage in favour of the respondent/husband and against the appellant/wife.

2. The parties were married on 21.7.2003 in Delhi. One issue was born out of the wedlock on 29.5.2004 at Chandigarh. In his petition, the respondent/ husband averred that after coming back from the honeymoon, the appellant lived with the respondent and his family only for a few days. Thereafter, the appellant left for Chandigarh to resume her work, and the respondent along with his parents was living in Delhi. The .respondent claimed that when the appellant conceived, the respondent requested her to return to Delhi at her matrimonial home. However, she did not return. The respondent further alleged that the respondent only came to know of the birth of the child from the wife of the landlord of the house at Chandigarh on the following day, and