SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJIV SHARMA, SHIVAKANT PRASAD
Rathindra Nath Acharya – Appellant
Versus
Mala Acharya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivakant Prasad, J.—Instant appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.1.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 4th Court, Howrah in Matrimonial Suit No. 413 of 2002.

2. The brief facts leading to the instant appeal is that the appellant/husband and the respondent/wife were married on 17.5.1994 according to Hindu Rites and Customs and their marriage registered subsequently. After marriage they began to live together. The moot allegation made in the petition is that though the husband had an honest effort to lead their conjugal life peacefully but his wife was not conscious of discharging her marital obligations even she had hatred feeling towards the mother and father of the husband/appellant and to oblige to desire of the wife appellant was compelled to live in a rented house and he was also compelled to provide a luxurious flat at her disposal. That the wife was always hostile to him transgressing the boundary of decency and she was in the habit to enter into the room with gross vulgarity and her behaviour towards her husband was unusual in a grotesque manner and her behaviour was so indecent to accuse the girl students without any basis c




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top