S.K.GANGELE, G.D.SAXENA
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Amar Kaur – Respondent
G.D. Saxena, J.—Since the order challenged in the aforesaid review petitions is one and the same, all these petitions are herewith, taken up together for final disposal by this common order.
(2) As the instant review preferred by the petitioners/State is hit with delay of 62 days for which an I.A. No. 3990/12 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been moved, before considering the contents of review, we think it proper to take up first the contents of application seeking condonation of delay.
(3) The grounds for causing delay in submitting the review petition are that after pronouncement of the order dated 6th July 2012 in Writ Appeal No. 205/2012, the certified copy was obtained on 31st August 2012 by the concerning department. Then, the matter was referred for obtaining necessary sanction and after receiving concurrence, the review petition came to be filed. It is mentioned in the application that the time was exhausted due to departmental procedure which was not based on mala fide on the part of the petitioners. Hence, it is requested that by allowing the application, delay that was caused in preferring the review petition may be condoned and the review itself may be hear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.