SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

L.N.MITTAL
Karambir – Appellant
Versus
Gayatri Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:R.S.Panghal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

L.N. Mittal, J.— Husband Karambir has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning order dated 6.5.2013 (Annexure P3), passed by learned District Judge (Family Court), Bhiwani, thereby dismissing application (Annexure P1), filed by the petitioner for dismissing the divorce petition, filed by respondent wife Gayatri Bai against the petitioner under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short the Act).

2. The husband, in his application (Annexure P1), has alleged that the wife is not permanent resident of Bhiwani nor she was serving temporarily at Bhiwani and in fact, both the parties are permanent residents of District Rewari, where marriage of the parties was also solemnized and consummated and the wife also used to reside with the husband in District Rewari. It was thus alleged that the Court at Bhiwani had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the divorce petition filed by the wife.

3. The wife, by filing reply (Annexure P2), opposed the application moved by the husband and controverted the averments made therein. It was asserted that the wife was residing in Bhiwani City, and therefore, Court at Bhiwani had terr









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top