SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
M. Varthamma – Appellant
Versus
Kannappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties:
For the Appellants: K.G. Krishna Murthy, AAG.
For the Respondents:S.S. Bhatt, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.— The plaintiffs in O.S.No.17 of 1985 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Chittoor, are the appellants. The suit was filed for the relief of declaration of title, in respect of suit schedule property of an extent of Ac.l.78 cents of land in survey No. 122/2B of Madireddipalle Revenue Village, erstwhile Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. The case of the appellants was that the land is held by themselves and their ancestors for a long period of about 100 years and that the respondents, who have Ac.1.04 cents in the immediate neighbourhood, are trying to interfere with their possession without any basis. It was also pleaded that the land in survey No. 122/2 comprising of Acs.2.82 cents was sub-divided into survey No.122/2A with Ac.1.04 cents and survey No. 122/2B with Ac. 1.78 cents, the suit schedule property.

2. The respondents opposed the suit by filing a written statement. According to them, the land was part of estate and after abolition of the estates, ryotwari settlement was made in their favour. It is also stated that in all the revenue records, their names were entered, so much so the pattadar pass book and title deeds were also is





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top