SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJES KUMAR, OM PRAKASH VII
Prakash Chandra Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Ritu Kapoor – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Smt. Anita Tripathi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajes Kumar, J.—Heard Smt. Anita Tripathi, learned Counsel for the appellant.

This is an appeal under section 19 of the Family Court Act against the order dated 9.9.2005 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Agara, by which he has rejected the petition filed by the appellant under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for divorce.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant married with the respondent on 21.11.1997 in accordance to Hindu rituals. A suit has been filed on the allegation that on 14.3.2008, the respondent-wife went to her Parents house after taking jewellery of sister-in-law of the appellant and thereafter did not come despite the efforts being made by the appellant. The last effort was made on 10.2.1999. When the appellant gone to respondent’s parents’ house to take her back, he has been physically assaulted, in respect of which a complaint has been filed before the Senior Superintendent of Police. Agra, Thereafter, the appellant has filed petition under section 9 of the Act, being case No. 257 of 1999 for the restitution of conjugal rights. Respondent filed complaint under section 498-A of the I.P.C. which has bee






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top