R.S. Chauhan, J.—Aggrieved by the order dated 30.5.2014 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) and the Presiding Officer, Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby the learned Magistrate has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC read with Section 21 of the Rent Control Act, 2001, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No.2, Alok had filed a suit for eviction against the petitioner, inter alia, on the ground of bona fide necessity of his son for parking his Santro car in the shop which had been rented out to the petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner had filed his written statement. Thereafter the issues were framed. According to the petitioner, after the issues were framed, the landlord constructed a wall in front of the shop in such a way that the wall blocked two feet of the entrance of the shop. Thus, according to the petitioner after the construction of the wall, the shop could not be used for parking the car. Since these were subsequent developments, after the submission of the written statement, the petitioner filed an application under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC fo