B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Padmavathi Cotton Tra – Appellant
Versus
T. V. Thangavadiveld Muruga Nadar Sons Firm – Respondent
B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.—The unsuccessful complainant of the private complaint case for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, The Act), presented the appeal, against the accused from acquittal judgment dated 01.03.2007 in C.C. No.112 of 2006 on the file of learned Special Judicial Magistrate of the First Class for Excise cases, Guntur.
2. Brief facts are that the Complainant is a merchant and doing cotton business, A-1 is cotton merchant, A-2 to A-4 are its partners and they used to purchase cotton from several persons like complainant on credit, that from 12.06.1998 onwards accused are maintaining khata with the complainant in the course of their business, that the said Khata is running and mutual. As per the khata the accused has to pay an amount of Rs.4,89,655/- to the complainant as on 05.12.2000 and the complainant demanded the accused several times to pay the said amount, that the accused gave cheque for Rs.4,76,552/- and the same was when presented returned dishonoured. The complainant issued a statutory legal notice and the accused got issued reply and did not pay the amount, for which the complainant presented the complaint
Goa Plast (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Chico Ursula Dsouza
Kumar Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Sharma Carpets
Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G. Hegde
Hiten P. Dalal v. Bratindranath Banerjee
Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company v. Amin Chand Pyarelal
M.M.T.C. Ltd. And Another v. Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd
Mallavarapu Kasivisweswara Rao v. Thadikonda Ramulu Firm & Ors.
Anil Gupta V. Star India Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.