SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.CHAUDHURY
Renuka Roy – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi kanta Roy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:N. Dhar, Advocate
For the Respondents: None

JUDGMENT

N. Chaudhury, J.—Principal defendants in Title Suit No. 54 of 1979 has preferred this Second Appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below. Suit of the plaintiff Lalchand Nomosudra, for declaration of his right, title and interest with respect to 2 Kathas 3 Chataks 10 Gondas described in Schedule 2 of the plaint and for recovery of Khass possession thereof by evicting the defendants, was decreed by the learned Trial Court and on appeal the said decree was upheld.

2. Lalchand Nomosudra, the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 54 of 1979 in the Court of learned Sadar Munsiff, Hailakandi, stating that land measuring 2B 2K 7Ch described in Schedule 1 to the plaint and covered by Dag No. 1883 and 1882 of Second R.S. Patta No. 218 situated in Mauza Hailakandi town, Porogonah Hailakandi, District Cachar was originally owned and possessed by Durga Sundari Dutta Gupta and Suhsila Sundari Dutta Gupta. The predecessor of the plaintiff purchased this land from the original owners by registered sale-deed dated 12.5.1961 and continued enjoying the same without any let or hindrance from any quarter. But by taking opportunity of the absence of the plaintiff and his


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top