SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HRISHIKESH ROY
Narayan Singha – Appellant
Versus
Milan Singha – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.K. Kalita, Mr. G.J. Saikia, Mr. N. Das, Advocates
For the Respondent: None appears

JUDGMENT

Hrishikesh Roy, J.—Heard Mr. P.K. Kalita, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, who filed the Title Suit No.21/2007 for recovery of possession, of the suit land under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The respondent (defendant) is unrepresented and on 05.09.2013 this Court ordered for ex-parte proceeding against him.

2. The petitioners are the successors of late Moneswar Singha and late Sarbeswar Singha. The father of the first 3 plaintiffs late Moneswar Singha, was occupying Schedule-A land measuring 1 bigha 1 katha in Dag No.77 of Annual Khiraj Patta No.22(O)/20(N) and the Schedule B land measuring 3 bighas land in Sakuli Tauzi Map No.52(O)/49(N). Similarly the 4th plaintiff’s father late Sarbeswar Singha was occupying 2 bighas of land covered by Sakuli Tauzi Map No.39. The defendant Milan Singha initially worked as a cultivator under the two predecessor’s 3rd brother, Sachindra Singha and he married the younger daughter Akani of Sachindra Singha. After the marriage, his father-in-law provided the defendant with 1 bigha of land under Sakuli Tauzi Map No.52(O)/49(N).

3. While occupying the 1 bigha gifted to him, on 30.06.2007, the defendant encroached















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top