SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Jabeen Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr.R.A.Chandrashekara Reddy, Advocate

ORDER

A.V.Chandrashekara, J.—The present petition is filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1988, challenging the order passed by the Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, in Criminall Misc. 456/06 dated 19.7.2012. By virtue of the said order, the learned Judge of the Family Court has enhanced maintenance from Rs.1,500/127. Cr.P.C. Being aggrieved by the said order, the respondent therein has filed this petition.

2. The petitioner herein was the respondent in the said case and respondents 1 to 3 herein were petitioners in Crl.MiscA456/06, a petition filed under Section 127, Cr.P.C. Parties will be referred to as petitioners 1 to 3 and respondent as per their ranking before the trial court.

3. The 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and petitioners 2 and 3 are-the children born out of the aid wedlock. Since the respondent had neglected to maintain them, they had to file a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Cri. Misc.512/96 before the Family Court, Bengaluru. The said petition was contested by the respondent and ultimately Rs.500 each came to be awarded as maintenance in favour of petitioners 1 to 3 order dated 22.1.2002.

4. Since the cost of living

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top