U.C.MAHESHWARI, B.D.RATHI
Ajai Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Chaurasia – Respondent
On behalf of appellant/plaintiff/applicant/husband of the respondent, this appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, being aggrieved by the order dated 20.7.2015 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Datia in MJC No.1/2015 whereby allowing the application of the respondent filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the proceeding under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree of divorce dated 24.9.2015 passed by the abovementioned court in HMA Case No.55/2013 filed by the appellant herein, the entire delay of near about one year in filing such proceeding of Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been condoned.
2. Appellant’s counsel after taking us through the appeal memo, the papers placed on the record along with impugned order argued that after filing petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the appellant herein in the aforesaid family court, the same was registered as HMA Case No.55/2013 and its notice was sent to the respondent through registered post with A.D. After service of the same, no-one appeared on he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.