SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.L.MANJUNATH, B.SREENIVASA GOWDA
Prakash Martin Tegur – Appellant
Versus
Joyee Samuel – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri Gowthamdev C. Ullal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Janardhana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

The legality and correctness of the decree of divorce granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore dated 8.6.2012 passed in M.C. No. 3578 of 2012 is called in question in this appeal.

2. The parties herein are Christians. Their marriage was solemnized on 31.12.2007 as per the Christians Rites and it was registered on 31.12.2007 and the registration certificate indicates that the marriage was registered under the provisions of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872.

3. Unfortunately, a joint petition was filed by the parties under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre. The parties have settled their dispute before the Mediation Centre. The Mediation Centre has also accepted the terms of settlement and a Memorandum of agreement as required under Section 89(IXa) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 came into existence. Thereafter, the settlement arrived at before the Mediation Centre was accepted by the Court below ‘dissolving the marriage solemnised between the parties on 31.12.2007 as per the provisions of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872. The legality and correctness of the same is called in question: in thi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top