Prashant Kumar Agarwal, J.—The petitioners, who are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the non-petitioner Dr, Vinita Choudhary, have preferred this criminal revision petition against that part of the order dated 5.7.2011 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate No. l1, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur in Complaint Case No. 13/2011 whereby an interim direction/order was made for the residence of the complainant in the house in dispute and also against the order dated 16.9.2011 passed by the appellate Court whereby the above-said order has been upheld and affirmed.

2. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this revision petition are that complainant Dr. Vinita Choudhary filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Act”) against the petitioners and her husband Shri Satish Bijarniya (non-petitioner No. 5 herein) seeking various relief’s under the provisions of the Act including one under Section 19 to the effect that the petitioners and non-petitioner No. 5 may be ordered to allow the complainant to continue to reside in the house in dispute or they may provide alternative accommodation