Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—List revised. None appears for the respondents.

2. Heard Ms. Manisha Ambwani, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vipin Sinha, learned Counsel for the revisionist.

3. The revision has been filed challenging the order dated 22nd April, 1998 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Bareilly in Suit No. 470 of 1996. By means of said order the Issue No.2 regarding valuation of the suit has been decided against the defendant-revisionist and it was held that the Court-fee paid of amount off 200/- is sufficient.

4. The submission of the learned Counsel for the revisionist is that the suit was filed for declaration that the sale agreement dated 20.9.1993 entered into between the parties and the conditions of the said agreement had not complied with by the defendant and as such the plaintiff is not liable to execute the sale-deed in favour of the defendant as per the agreement. Further relief was sought is that declaration be made to the effect that as the defendants are guilty of violation of terms and conditions of sale agreement, the plaintiff is under no obligation to refund the entire sale consideration for an amount of Rs. 31,40,000/- paid to him pursuant