SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.S.OKA, SADHANA S.JADHAV
Dinesh B. Chokshi – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Vasudeo Bhatt – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicants:Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Sr. Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae, Mr. Prakash Naik along with Mr.Ganesh Bhujbal & Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni (in Criminal Application Nos. 2933 to 2935 of 2007), Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni (in Criminal Application No.779 of 2008), Mr. Nitin V. Gangal (in Criminal Application No.1499 of 2010) & Mr. M.D. Mali i/b M/s. M. D. Mali & Co. (in Criminal Application No.2391 of 2010),
For the Respondent No. 1: Mr. S. V. Marwadi (in Criminal Application Nos.2933 to 2936 of 2007) and Mr. Ranvir Shekhawat (in Criminal Application No.2391 of 2010)
For the Respondent No.2/State: Mr. J. H. Kuril
i/b Mr. Pravin V Gavle (in Criminal Application No. 1499 of 2010), Mrs. M. M.Deshmukh, APP (in Criminal Application Nos.2933 to 2936 of 2007, 779 of 2008, 2391 of 2010), in Criminal Application No. 1499 of 2010.

JUDGMENT

A.S. Oka, J.— On the basis of Judgment and Order dated 23rd December, 2008 passed by learned Single Judge, the Hon’ble the Chief Justice passed an order on the Administrative Side directing that these matters should be placed before a Division Bench. Accordingly, these Applications have been placed before this Court.

2. The reference to Division Bench is for deciding the two questions formulated by the learned Single Judge under his Judgment and Order dated 23rd December, 2008.

The said two questions are:

‘(i) Does the issuance of a cheque in repayment of a time barred debt amounts to a written promise to pay the said debt within the meaning of Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?

(ii) If it amounts to such a promise, does such a promise, by itself, create any legally enforceable debt or other liability as contemplated by Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?’

3. We have heard Shri A.P. Mundargi, learned Senior Counsel who was appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court, Shri Prakash Naik, Shri S.S. Kulkarni, Shri M. D. Mali, Shri Nitin V. Gangal and Shri S.V. Marwadi, the learned counsel representing the various parties.

Submissions

4. Shri






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top