SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARUN BHANSALI
Kamla – Appellant
Versus
Mangi Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. V.N. Kalla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Arun Bhansali, J.—This appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (‘the Act’) has been filed against the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Nimbahera dated 17.4.1998, whereby the application filed by the respondents No.1 and 2 under Section 276 of the Act was allowed and a probate of will executed by deceased Bheru Lal dated 6.4.1992 was ordered to be granted to them.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Smt Mangi Bai and Smt. Suhagi Bai, both daughters of Shri Veni Ram filed application under Section 276 of the Act seeking probate of registered will dated 6.4.1992 executed by their brother Bheru Lal, who died on 1.2,1993, It was stated in the application that they were real sisters of deceased Bheru Lal, who died issueless and had no wife and to take care of the fact that there is no dispute in the future, the said will was executed by the deceased Bheru Lal in their favour. It was further indicated that the appellant herein who was impleaded as defendant in the said application had got the land, which was bequeath under the will to them, mutated in her favour by claiming herself to be the wife of deceased Bheru Lal and the said land was acquire



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top