KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA, KANCHAN CHAKRABORTY
Radha Kishan Garodia – Appellant
Versus
Hari Prasad Saraf and Gopal Prasad Saraf – Respondent
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.— The appeal being No.228 of 2006 has been filed by one Hari Prasad Saraf who was the plaintiff in Title Suit No.1620 of 1999, the Appeal No.230 has been filed by one Gopal Prasad Saraf who was the plaintiff in Title Suit No.619 of 1999, however, the Appeal No.229 of 2006 was preferred by both the aforesaid respondents in Title Suit No.1062 of 1999 filed by the appellant herein. First two suits in connection with the aforesaid appeals were filed by Hari and Gopal, who are the brothers, for eviction of the plaintiff in the Title Suit being No.1062 of 1999 and appellant in the Appeal No.229 of 2006 who prayed for decree of declaration that he was a tenant.
2. The learned Trial Judge analogously heard all the three suits as stated above and by common judgment and order dismissed the suits filed by the appellant who asked for declaratory relief, and the decree was passed in favour of both the aforesaid respondents for eviction.
3. Before the learned trial Judge both Gopal and Hari filed their respective suits asking for a decree for recovery of possession of Flat Nos. 10C situates at Premises No.2, H. Sarani, Kolkata so far as Gopal is concerned and Fla
Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab
Iswar Bhai C. Patel alias Bachu Bhai Patel v. Harihar Behera and Anr.
Vidhyadhar v. Manikrao and Anr.
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and Anr. v. Indusind Bank, Ltd. and Ors.
Rajbir Kaur v. M/s S. Chokosiri and Co.
Delta International Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Ganeriwalla and Anr.
C.M. Beena and Anr. v. P.N. Ramachandra Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.