VINEET KOTHARI
Manmohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ankur Enterprises – Respondent
Dr. Vineet Kothari, J.—The present misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are directed against the order dated 14.1.2011 passed by the revisional court dismissing the revision petitions of the accused petitioner against the order passed by the learned trial court by which the application under Section 203 Cr.P.C. dated 28.5.2010 was rejected by the learned trial court on 27.9.2010.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manoj Bhandari relying upon the decision of a Coordinate bench of this Court dated 22.7.2009 in the case of Prakash Chand v. State of Raj. & Anr. 2009(3) WLC (Raj.) 766 submitted that the learned trial Court could not have taken cognizance on the complaint filed by the respondent complainant M/s. Ankur Enterprises under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act merely on the basis of affidavit filed along with the complaint without examining the complainant and recording his statements on oath under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and learned court below has erred in rejecting the revision petition filed by the accused petitioner. The relevant portion of the judgment of coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Prakash Chand v. State of Rajasthan and Anr., (s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.