SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDIRA BANERJEE
Rotomac Electricals Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Railway Equipment Co. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appearing Parties:Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Ranjan Bachawat and Ravi Kapoor, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Indira Banerjee, J.—This application has been taken out by the petitioner, seeking orders restraining the respondent from initiating or proceeding with any legal proceedings in any Court in Illinois or in any other place in the United States of America or in any forum other than this Court.

2. The plaintiff/petitioner is engaged in manufacture, sale and repair of locomotive traction motors, spare parts and other ancillary commodities. The registered office of the plaintiff/petitioner is situated in Kolkata, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. On or about 1st October, 2008, the petitioner entered into an agreement in writing with the respondent for supply of traction motors the respondent on terms and conditions stipulated in the said agreement.

4. The execution of the aforesaid agreement was preceded by negotiations and exchange of correspondence including e-mails within the jurisdiction of this Court. It is alleged that the respondent and/or its representatives even inspected the factory of the petitioner in India.

5. Pursuant to and/or in terms of the aforesaid agreement, the petitioner shipped traction motors to the respondent in Illinois in USA, on freight on boar
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top