SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.B.GUPTA
Ashok Kumar Mehra – Appellant
Versus
Kuldeep Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

JUDGMENT

V .B. Gupta, J.—This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short ‘Act’) has been filed by the petitioners against judgment dated 17th September, 2009, passed by Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, vide which respondent’s eviction petition was allowed and eviction order was passed in favour of respondent and against the present petitioners.

2. Brief facts are that respondent (Petitioner-Landlord in the trial court) filed an eviction petition in respect of one room, one verandah, one store, one kitchen, one bathroom, one latrine, one room with asbestos sheet roof in the courtyard, open courtyard on the ground floor and two rooms, one kitchen, covered terrace on the first floor of the building bearing No. XIV /11152/8, Rashid Ahmed Building, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi; against petitioners (Respondent-Tenant in the trial court).

3. It is stated that respondent is the owner/landlord of the premises in question. This property was purchased by father of the respondent, namely Sh. Ranbir Lal Mehra on 16.3.1967. Predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners alongwith the petitioners were already in occupation of the building and using the same as tena

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top