SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRAFULLA C.PANT
Mukesh Devi – Appellant
Versus
Manju Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—By means of this petition moved under Article 226 read with Article 227 Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged order dated 19.02.2009 passed by the Trial Court (1st Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Dehradun) in Suit No.194/2007 , Mukesh Devi v. Manju Devi, and order dated 30th of April, 2009 passed by Revisional Court (Addl. District Judge/F.T.C.V, Dehradun) in Civil Revision No.33 of 2009 whereby the order passed by the Trial Court is affirmed, staying the proceedings of subsequent suit under section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. Brief facts of the case are that respondent Smt. Manju Devi filed Original Suit No.130/2007 against the petitioner Mukesh Devi for cancellation of agreement dated 05.05.2006 for sale. Thereafter, Suit No.184/2007 is filed by the petitioner Mukesh Devi against respondent Munju Devi for specific performance of the same agreement dated 05.05.2006. In the subsequent suit, the defendant raised the plea to stay the proceedings under section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, on which the impugned order dated 19.02.2009 was passed by the trial Court staying the proceedings o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top