SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHAM SUNDER
Sukhmander Singh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Electricity Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Sham Sunder, J.—This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the order dated 15.6.2009, rendered by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridkot, vide which it dismissed the application, under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the judgment and decree dated 7.7.2009, rendered by the Court of District Judge, Faridkot, vide which, it dismissed the appeal, has been filed by the revision petitioner.

2. The plaintiff claimed himself to be the owner in possession of the land, in question. It was stated that the land of defendant No.4 is situated on the north side of his land. It was further stated that electricity was being supplied by defendant Nos. l to 3, 5 and 6 from the residential area of the village towards western side of the land of the plaintiff. It was further stated that defendant Nos.1 to 3, 5 and 6, in connivance with defendant No.4, were bent upon erecting the electric poles, and passing the electric wires, through the field of the plaintiff, from point X towards the southern side of his land for giving supply of electricity to him (defendant No.4), although there was














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top