V. Jagannathan, J.— These two appeals are preferred by the plaintiffs in the Trial Court in O.S. No.7039 of 2003 and challenge is to the order passed on I.A. No.20. M.F.A. No.3134 of 2010 is by the plaintiffs 1, 10 and 11 and M.F.A. No. 3351 of 2010 is by the plaintiffs 2 to 7 and 9. Said I.A. No.20 was filed by the plaintiffs seeking an order of temporary injunction against 7th defendant from preventing said defendant and his agents etc., from excavating or putting up any construction pursuant to lease deed dated 12.12.2005 executed by defendants 1 to 6 in respect of the suit schedule property. The schedule to said I.A. No. 20 has been mentioned as property bearing No. 33/2 (forming portion of old Municipal No.3, subsequent No.33), Ulsoor Road, Ward No.81, Bangalore, measuring approximately 33,708 sq. ft., all that property forming portion of Municipal No.33 and measuring 6,475 sq. ft. Said I.A. was dismissed by the Trial Court with certain conditions imposed on 7th defendant. It is this order i.e., called in question in these appeals.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the plaintiffs’ case before the Trial Court in their suit for partition and separate possession of the pla