SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL
Manager, State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Md. Jahir – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Swarup Banerjee, Mr. H.C. Yadav, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Manojit Mandal, J.—None is present to represent the opposite party.

2. Though none appears for the opposite party, at the instance of the petitioner the matter is taken up for hearing and disposal on merit.

3. Heard Mr. Banerjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

4. This application is directed against the Order No. 21 dated 18.04.2019 passed by the learned Judge, 12th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Suit No. 1467 of 2017 thereby rejecting an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendant/petitioner.

5. Plaintiff/opposite party herein instituted a suit being Title Suit No. 1467 of 2017 against the petitioner praying for relief that the plaintiff is entitled to ply vehicle being No. WB 23C-7167 peacefully without any disturbance and/or interference by the defendant, his men and agents. He further claimed that a decree be passed declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to get all papers and documents upon which signatures were taken up by the defendant in blank form including the cheques without putting the amount and date and the same are all invalid. He further claimed th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top