SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIKASH JAIN
Ashok Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ambika Singh @ Phulan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Vikash Jain, J.—The present petition has been filed “for setting aside the order dated 26.09.2019 passed in T.S. No. 193/2019 passed by the learned Sub Judge Ist-cum-ACJM Ist-cum-A.S.J.Ist, Buxar whereby and whereunder he has directed the plaintiff to pay ad-valorem Court fee on the valuation given for the purpose of jurisdiction and Court fee according to report of Seristedar.”

2. The plaintiff/petitioner filed title suit number 193/19 for the following reliefs —

“(i) A preliminary decree of partition be passed over Schedule-4 property and ½ share of the plaintiff be declared and carved out by survey knowing pleader;

(ii) Gift deed dated 07.09.2015 executed by Laxman Singh in favour of defendants (4th set) details of which given in Schedule-5 of the plaint be declared null and void and not binding on plaintiffs;

(iii) Temporary injunction be issued on Schedule 4 land so that the property may not destroy;

(iv) Cost of suit be awarded against defendants;

(v) Any other relief/reliefs which deem fit and proper.”

3. On the basis of a report of the seristedar, the impugned order dated 26.09.2019 has been passed directing the plaintiff/petitioner to pay ad valorem cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top