SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Saurabh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Magistrate (East) – Respondent


For the Petitioners:Mr. K.C. Mittal, Mr. Joby P. Varghese and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent Nos.1 to 4:Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghai and Mr. Manas Bhatnagar, Advocates
For the Respondent No.5: Mr. Farman Ali Magray, Sr. Panel Counsel
W.P.(C) 8455 of 2020 & CM APPL.27312 of 2020:
For the Petitioners:Petitioner in person
For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, ASC, GNCTD
For the Respondent No.5:Mr. Bhagavan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Advocate
W.P.(C) 8588 of 2020:
For the Petitioners:Petitioner in person
For the Respondent No.1: Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhishabh Jetly, Advocate for GNCTD
W.P.(C) 9408 of 2020:
For the Petitioners:Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Advocate with Petitioner in person
For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3:Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghai and Mr. Manas Bhatnagar, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.—These are four writ petitions filed challenging the imposition of fine of Rs.500/-, on the Petitioners, for non – wearing of face masks while travelling alone in a private car. The brief facts of each of the cases are captured below.

2. In W.P.(C) 6595/2020, the Petitioner’s case is that he is a practicing advocate for the last 20 years. On 9th September, 2020, at about 11.00 A.M., he was driving a Honda City DL 13CC 1479, and was stopped by the police near Geeta Colony, New Delhi. It is not disputed that he was travelling alone in his car. After the car was stopped, an Executive Magistrate, along with a Police Constable and a Delhi Police Inspector, informed the Petitioner that a fine of Rs. 500/- is being imposed on him for not wearing a mask in a public place. The Petitioner challenged such imposition of fine before the officials, on the ground that since he was travelling alone in his car, the said car does not constitute a public place and would be a private zone. Accordingly, it is prayed that the challan bearing challan no. 2993, dated 9th September, 2020, be quashed and the amount of Rs. 500/- be refunded. In addition, compensation of Rs.10,00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top