ARUN BHANSALI
Shanti Lal – Appellant
Versus
Shantilal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Bhansali, J.—This appeal under Section 96 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 07.08.2002 passed by District Judge Pali, whereby, the suit filed by the respondent - plaintiff has been decreed for possession and mesne profit.
2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff on 11.08.1992 for possession of the suit property and mesne profit on the ground that one Hastimal, who was plaintiff’s maternal uncle, executed a will dated 08.11.1976 in his favour, the said Hastimal died on 19.12.1976 and as such all the rights which Hastimal had came to be vested in him qua the immoveable property and since then plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the immovable property.
3. It was further indicated in the plaint that Late Hastimal had a sister named Sukniya Bai, who was residing with him being a widow at a young age and as it was the Will of the testator that she can reside in the suit property till her death and as such, she remained in the house after the death of Hastimal and that Smt. Sukniya Bai died on 12.05.1992.
4. It is claimed that as plaintiff was the only son of his father, for helping him in his cloth business he used to reside with his father and would re
Union of India v. K.V. Lakshman & Ors.
Satyavati Ramprasad Ruia v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Timmajamma & Ors.
Rani Purnima Debi & Anr. v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb & Anr.
Bharpur Singh & Ors. v. Shamsher Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.