SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJAN ROY, RAVI NATH TILHARI
Satish Maurya – Appellant
Versus
Divya Neha – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Pravin Singh, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.—Heard Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material on record.

2. This first appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 06.03.2021 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Court No. 6, Family Court, Lucknow in Original Suit No. 23 of 2019, Satish Maurya Vs. Divya Neha, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

3. By means of the judgment and order dated 06.03.2021, the suit for divorce filed by the appellant has been dismissed, but a decree for judicial separation has been passed.

4. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was solemnized on 08.02.2015 according to the Hindu rites and rituals. On the facts stated in the divorce petition, the suit was filed for a decree of divorce on 03.01.2019. The suit proceeded exparte vide order dated 23.11.2019, which order was recalled on 11.11.2020, but inspite thereof the written statement was not filed. The case was fixed for evidence, in which the appellant filed his evidence and vide order dated 06.03.2021 the suit for divorce was dismissed. The court granted decree for judicial s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top