Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicants:Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Dhirendra Mishra, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Sameer Sharma, Dy. GA
For the Respondent No.4:Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Advocate

Based on the provided legal document, the key legal points are as follows:

1. Proof of Will Execution: The propounder of a Will must demonstrate that the Will was signed by the testator and that the testator was in a sound and disposing state of mind at the time of execution. The evidence must establish that the testator understood the nature and effect of the disposition and signed the Will voluntarily (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

2. Validity of Will: The Will must be executed in accordance with legal requirements, including proper attestation by at least two witnesses who have seen the testator sign or acknowledge the Will in their presence. The circumstances surrounding the execution, such as the testator’s mental capacity and the presence of suspicious circumstances, are critical in determining its validity (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

3. Suspicious Circumstances and Doubts: The proximity of the Will’s execution date to the testator’s death, the absence of the testator’s medical evidence, and the non-disclosure of certain facts (such as the existence of other children) raise doubts about the mental capacity of the testator and the authenticity of the Will. These suspicious circumstances require thorough clarification by the propounder (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

4. Rights of Coparceners: Daughters of a coparcener are entitled to an equal share in the coparcenary property as sons, with rights and liabilities similar to those of sons. This is applicable to properties inherited after the enactment of the relevant amendments, and the rights are conferred by birth, regardless of whether the daughter was alive on the date of the amendment or not (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

5. Equal Share in the Property: Since the property was inherited by the deceased mother, the plaintiff and defendants, being coparceners, are entitled to an equal share in the property as per the amended Hindu Succession Act (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

6. Rejection of Will and Counter Claims: The Will was not proved in accordance with legal requirements, and suspicious circumstances cast doubt on its authenticity. Consequently, the claim based on the Will is invalid, and the rights of the coparceners, including the defendants’ counter claim, are upheld, granting them an equal share in the property (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .

7. Effect of Sale and Additional Parties: The sale of part of the land to a third party was considered, and the impact on the property rights was acknowledged. The sale deed and subsequent proceedings have been incorporated into the case, affecting the distribution of shares (!) (!) .

8. Overall Decision: The appeal is allowed, the judgment and decree of the trial court are set aside, and a decree is issued granting the defendants an equal share in the property, recognizing their rights as coparceners under the amended Hindu Succession Act (!) (!) .

These points collectively reflect the legal principles and findings established in the case regarding the validity of the Will, the rights of coparceners, and the distribution of property among heirs.