SHAMEEM AKTHER, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, SHAMEEM AKTHER, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Prasad Moorthygari – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumari – Respondent
JUDGMENT (COMMON)
Dr. Shameem Akther, J.— Since the facts of the case, issue involved and the parties to the litigation are one and the same in both these appeals, both these appeals are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. FCA Nos.135 and 136 of 2014, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, are filed by the appellant/husband-Sai Prasad Moorthygari, challenging the common order, dated 24.06.2014, passed in FCOP Nos.21 of 2009 and 87 of 2010, by the Judge, Family Court-cum-III Additional District Judge, Warangal, whereby, the Court below, while dismissing the petition filed by the appellant/husband under Section 13(1)(ia)&(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion (FCOP No.87 of 2010), allowed the petition filed by the respondent/wife-Ram Kumari under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights (FCOP No.21 of 2009), directing the appellant/husband to restore the conjugal rights within two months from the date of the said common order.
3. We have heard the submissions of Sri P.Giri Krishna, learned counsel for the appellant/husband in both these appeals, Sri C.A.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.