Dharam Veer Goel VS Renu Jain

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SACHIN DATTA, SACHIN DATTA
Dharam Veer Goel – Appellant
Versus
Renu Jain – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Prashant Diwan, Ms. Mishika Vig and Ms. Shailja Jha, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Imran Khan, Mr. Rohit Kumar and Ms. Pooja Bansal, Advocates

Dharam Veer Goel VS Renu Jain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Judicial Analysis

No cases in the provided list are explicitly identified as overruled, reversed, or treated as bad law. The case law description does not include any language indicating negative treatment or judicial disapproval. Therefore, there are no cases to categorize as bad law at this stage.

[Followed]

None explicitly indicated. The case law description appears to be a standalone summary without references to subsequent judicial treatment.

[Distinguished / Criticized / Questioned / Reversed / Overruled / Abrogated]

None of these treatment patterns are explicitly mentioned in the provided case law summary. The description is focused on the facts and legal reasoning within the case itself, without referencing subsequent judicial treatment or appellate decisions.

The treatment of this case in subsequent jurisprudence is not provided. Without references to later decisions or treatment language, it is impossible to determine whether the case has been overruled, criticized, or otherwise negatively treated. Therefore, the treatment remains uncertain based on the information provided.

**Source :** Aniyeri Jayarajan VS Valiya Kooleri Koorma Yesoda - Kerala Abid-Ul-Islam VS Inder Sain Dua - Supreme Court Shantilal Thakordas VS Chimanlal Maganlal Telwala - Supreme Court

SACHIN DATTA, SACHIN DATTADharam Veer Goel – AppellantVersusRenu Jain – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

Judicial Analysis

SACHIN DATTA, SACHIN DATTA
Dharam Veer Goel – Appellant
Versus
Renu Jain – Respondent