Back
V. SRISHANANDA
Nabisab – Appellant
Versus
Hatelsab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Present second appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant.
2. The appeal came to be admitted on the following substantial question of law.
“In the light of the finding in the negative over issue No. 4 by the trial Court, whether the lower appellate court was justified in reversing the finding, as recorded in para 21 of the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court, so as to dismiss the suit?”
3. Parties are referred to as plaintiff and defendant for the sake of convenience as per their original ranking in the trial Court.
4. Heard Sri T.M.Nadaf and Sri Sadiq N.Goodwala, learned counsels for the appellant and Sri Suraj M.Katagi, learned counsel for the respondent.
5. Brief facts of the case are as under:
A suit came to be filed by the plaintiff in 0.S. No. 52/ 2001 before the Civil Judge (Jr.On.), Kalghatagi for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant declaring that plaintiff is the absolute owner of the following properties.
| Sl. No. | Sy. No. | Measurement |
|
| 1. | 1/ 2 | 6 guntas | Situated at Bogenaga-rako |
Mohammadan Law – Batil Marriage – Unless first marriage is duly dissolved as per Mohammadan law second marriage should be considered as ‘Batil’ marriage.
The acknowledgment of paternity must establish the acknowledgment of legitimacy under Mahomedan Law to prove entitlement to inheritance.
The concept of joint family property is not recognized under Mohammedan Law; mere presence in revenue records does not negate co-heir status.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The legitimacy and entitlement of a child under inheritance laws were upheld, affirming that co-sharers can inherit from a deceased without other claimants, despite claims of illegitimacy contrary to....
Registered partition deed between brothers under Mohammedan law creates valid title; High Court cannot re-appreciate facts absent substantial question of law in second appeal.
Under Mohammedan Law, co-owners are only tenants in common, and the heirs of a deceased Mohammedan being in possession of the whole estate will be deemed to be in possession on behalf of the other co....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
