Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee, Mr. P.K. Khan, Mr. Subhajit Manna, Mr. Somdev Ash and Mr. Shounak Mondal, Advocates
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. B.K. Roy, Advocate

Based on the provided legal document, the key legal points are as follows:

1. The dishonour of a cheque does not automatically establish a legally enforceable debt if part payment has been made after the debt was incurred and before the cheque was presented for encashment. In such cases, the entire cheque amount cannot be considered as representing the full debt owed (!) (!) .

2. For a cheque to be issued in discharge of a debt or liability, it must be clear that the cheque was intended to cover the entire or part of the debt at the time of issuance. If a part payment is made after the cheque is issued but before it is presented for encashment, this reduces the liability, and the cheque may not be considered as issued in full or partial discharge of the debt (!) (!) .

3. Under the applicable law, any endorsement of part payment on a negotiable instrument must conform to statutory requirements, including proper endorsement on the instrument itself, to be valid for negotiation of the remaining amount. The absence of such endorsement can undermine the enforceability of the cheque for the remaining amount (!) (!) .

4. If the amount paid after the debt was incurred reduces the liability, the cheque cannot be deemed as issued in discharge of that liability, and consequently, the dishonour of such a cheque does not necessarily constitute an offence under the relevant law (!) (!) .

5. The judgment emphasizes that the complainant or the opposite party retains the right to initiate proceedings to recover the debt through appropriate legal channels, despite the setting aside of the conviction based on the cheque's dishonour (!) (!) .

6. The court's decision highlights the importance of strict adherence to statutory provisions regarding endorsements and the timing of payments relative to the issuance of the cheque, which are critical in establishing the enforceability of a cheque under the law (!) (!) .

These points collectively clarify the legal stance that part payments made after the incurrence of debt and before cheque encashment can impact the enforceability of the cheque and the applicability of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act.