A. BADHARUDEEN
Poyil Salim – Appellant
Versus
Thazhe Kandoth Mariyam – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Defendants 2 to 4 in O.S.No.50/2016 on the files of Munsiff Court, Nadapuram have filed this Second Appeal under Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure assailing the decree and judgment in A.S.No.5/2021 on the files of Sub Court, Vadakara, whereby the learned Sub Judge confirmed the decree and judgment rendered by the trial court. The respondents are the plaintiffs as well as other defendants.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants/defendants 2 to 4 on admission. Perused the verdicts under challenge and the relevant documents placed by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants.
3. I shall refer the parties in this appeal relegating their status before the trial court as ‘plaintiffs’ and ‘defendants’ hereafter for easy reference.
4. This is a Suit filed for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property on the strength of title and the plaintiffs are the children of one Ayisha. According to the plaintiffs, Ayisha obtained leasehold right in respect of properties including the plaint schedule property as per registered assignment deed No.94/1953 executed by one Anthraman, who got right over the same, on the stren
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a purchase certificate obtained by one co-owner shall enure to the benefit of all co-owners, as provided under S.72K of the Kerala Land Reform....
When a certificate of purchase is obtained by one co-owner, the benefit automatically enures to the benefit of others once it is established by evidence that the same was obtained by one co-owner.
Civil courts lack jurisdiction to invalidate a purchase certificate issued under the Kerala Land Reforms Act if due process is followed.
The court affirmed that a Purchase Certificate under the Kerala Land Reforms Act is conclusive proof of title, and the plaintiffs' claim was time-barred due to their prior knowledge of the sale deed.
The appellant lacked lawful rights to claim fixity of tenure due to invalid assignments and ongoing litigation affecting the property.
The validity and consequences of a sale deed, including the transfer of title and possession, must be raised and challenged within the statutory time limit to be considered valid.
Importent Point: A certificate issued under Section 72-K of the Act is conclusive. Once the same is found to be conclusive, same can not be refused to be taken into consideration for any purpose wha....
Being concurrent findings on facts is no guarantee for an imprimatur from High Court as under certain situations interference under Section 100, CPC after formulating substantial question (s) of law ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that ownership rights over land must be supported by valid evidence and in accordance with the provisions of the Mizo District (Land and Revenue) A....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of valid documentation for establishing property ownership and highlights the contradictory nature of claiming adverse possession against one's own property.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.