SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 220

SANJAY KUMAR, P.KESHAVA RAO
Niranjan Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.V. Subba Reddy.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR, J.

1. Niranjan Vyas, the petitioner in these cases, filed two applications under section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity ‘the SARFAESI Act’) before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Hyderabad (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’). He filed SAIR No. 164 of 2018 assailing the action of the State Bank of India (for brevity ‘the bank’) in fixing the reserve price at Rs. 3,00,00,000/- for two different properties in the sale notice dated 28.06.2017 which led to the auction sale on 09.08.2017. In SAIR No. 165 of 2018, his prayer was to declare the action of the bank in fixing the reserve price at Rs. 20,06,00,000/- for five properties in the sale notice published on 21.08.2017, leading to the auction sale on 08.09.2017.

2. Both the securitization applications were filed with delay. I.A. No. 3445 of 2018 was filed in SAIR No. 164 of 2018 to condone the delay of 282 days in the filing of the securitization application. A similar application, in I.A. No. 3447 of 2018, was filed in SAIR No. 165 of 2018 seeking condonation of the delay of 252 days in its presentation. By separate orders date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top