SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 243

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Mohan Rayalu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : H. Srinivasa Rao and Vijayalakshmi, Adv.

ORDER :

Dr. B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. Proof of service filed, second respondent de facto complainant not chosen to appear. Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned public prosecutor.

2. The Criminal Petition is filed by sole petitioner accused in C.C. No. 564 of 2016 on the file of VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, where the learned Magistrate taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 506 and 509 IPC, which is outcome of a private complaint of the second respondent de facto complainant dated 24.02.2014 on the file of the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate that was referred to police for investigation from which police registered Crime No. 128 of 2014 of Humayun Nagar police station dated 28.03.2014. The police after investigation filed a charge sheet against the petitioner by citing six witnesses including three investigating officers L.Ws. 4 to 6 and de facto complainant LW1, so called eye witnesses L.Ws. 2 and 3. The private complaint of her by name Annie, W/o. Simon of Bangalore, temporarily residing at Tappachabutra, Hyderabad, filed against the petitioner Mohan Rayulu, referred as residing at Journalist Colony, Jubilee Hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top