SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Telangana) 217

T.VINOD KUMAR
Nadigottu Balram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Kotagiri Sreedhar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

T.Vinod Kumar, J. - The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2019 and consequently direct the respondents to provide police protection in view of the judgment and decree passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Gajwel dated 03.02.2012 in O.S. No.126 of 2010 granting perpetual injunction in favour of the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

2. While the above writ petition was pending for the Government Pleader to get instructions, I.A. No. 2 of 2019 was filed on behalf of one V. Srinivas, to implead himself in the writ petition as Respondent No. 8, and the said application was allowed by the court on 26.12.2019.

3. Heard Sri Kotagiri Sreedhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned Counsel appearing for the 8th respondent.

4. The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the property to an extent of 90 square yards in Sy.No.543/U of Munigadapa village, Jagadevpur Mandal, Siddipet District, having purchased the same from its previous owner Sri N. Jaip

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top