SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Telangana) 226

T.VINOD KUMAR
Mohammed Mushtaq Hussain Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Ganesh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

T.Vinod Kumar, J. - The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in seeking to arrest the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.3 in ROR No.09-5 of 2017 in OR No.19/C of 2019-20 on the file of Hyderabad East Range, Hyderabad, for the alleged offences under Section 9 read with Section 2(16), 39, 49, 50, 57 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, which is bailable offence, as being illegal, arbitrary with consequential direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in the above crime.

2. Heard Sri S. Ganesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Pramada Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Forests.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities have registered a case against one Saleh Bin Mohammed Badam and Ali Bin Mohammed under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, alleging that A-1 was in illegal possession of Slow Loris (live animal), Indian Star Tortoise (live animal) and Soft Shell Turtle (live animal) and that A-1 and A-2 are doing business in Wild Life animals. It is upon the arrest of A-1 and A-2, who were initially absconding and on being apprehended, A-2 confessed that he is work

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top