SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 301

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, N.TUKARAMJI
Seetharama Chandra Swamy Vari – Appellant
Versus
Kandula Satyam, S/o Rangaiah – Respondent


ORDER :

1. The present writ petition is arising out of a notice issued by the Upa-Lokayukta dated 01.03.2017 directing the petitioner to handover possession of the subject house to the respondent No.1 herein.

2. The facts of the case reveal that a complaint was preferred to the Upa-Lokayukta by the respondent No.1 herein stating that the petitioner Devasthanam has taken possession of the subject house and the Upa-Lokayukta has issued a notice to the petitioner directing delivery of possession.

3. This Court on 20.12.2021 had an occasion to deal with the issue of jurisdiction of Lokayukta in W.P.Nos.5196 and 5204 of 2021, which were filed by the Telangana State Film Development Corporation Limited being aggrieved by the notice received by them and the proceedings dated 18.06.2020 directing the petitioner to submit a representation in respect of a complaint filed before the Lokayukta/Upalokayuta for the State of Telangana under the Telangana Lokayukta Act, 1983 [as amended by Act 31 of 2017] for reimbursement of Rs.30 lakhs.

4. The order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.5196 and 5204 of 2021 on 20.12.2021 is reproduced as under:-

    “Regard being had to the controversy involved in the aforesa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top