JUDGMENT :

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.

1. The present writ appeal is arising out of an order dated 18.04.2017 passed in W.P. No. 25934 of 2010.

2. The facts of the case reveal that the writ petition was preferred before this Court by the respondents/writ petitioners being aggrieved by the action of the Tahsildar in demolishing the compound wall and two rooms on the subject property. The petitioners stated that their father was the titleholder of the property to an extent of 3,764 square yards and a house bearing No. 1-6-261/A/4 was constructed. Before the learned Single Judge, it was stated on an affidavit that proceedings were initiated under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short “the Act”) and a statement was filed under Section 6 of the Act, declaration was submitted and after conducting a detailed enquiry, the Enquiry Officer passed an order declaring the land as non-surplus land and holding that the petitioners are entitled to hold it. The State never objected to the order passed under the Act. Later on, an application was submitted for grant of permission for construction of a residential complex. It was sanctioned vide permit dated 01.01.2010. Subsequently,