A. ABHISHEK REDDY
B. Chandra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No. 1 and Sri N. Praveen Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for Municipality for respondent No. 2. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.
2. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the notice dated 30.12.2020 issued by respondent No. 2 directing the petitioners to remove the unauthorized sheds within three days from the date of receipt of the said notice.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing, respondent No. 2-the Commissioner, Vikarabad Municipality, has straightaway issued the impugned notice directing the petitioners to remove the structures, which is contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 and principles of natural justice, and therefore, prays to set aside the impugned notice.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2-Municipality states that the petitioners may be directed to submit their explanation to the i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.