SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 303

UJJAL BHUYAN, N. TUKARAMJI
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Settlement Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel
For the Respondent: Mr. M.Naga Deepak

ORDER :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department appearing for the petitioner and Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for respondent No.2 – assessee.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 18.03.2008 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Chennai (briefly, ‘the Settlement Commission’ hereafter), in Settlement Application No.AP/HD51/06-07/18/IT.

3. Respondent No.2 is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly, ‘the Act’ hereinafter) and is engaged in the business of civil construction. It is stated that business activities of respondent No.2 is spread over the then State of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Goa.

4. On 16.12.2004, a search and seizure operation was carried out in the business and residential premises of respondent No.2 under Section 132 of the Act. That apart, survey was also c

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top