Back
UJJAL BHUYAN, N. TUKARAMJI
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad Zonal Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of actions taken by authorities. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioners regarding constitutional violations. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. court observations on the investigations and actions by enforcement authorities. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. interpretation of pmla provisions concerning reason to believe and jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal determination regarding scheduled offences and grounds for actions under pmla. (Para 23) |
| 6. conclusion on lack of jurisdiction leading to quashing of the order. (Para 39 , 40 , 42 , 44) |
ORDER :
(Ujjal Bhuyan, J.)
Heard Mr. T.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing E.Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel for the petitioners; and Mr. V.Ram Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Enforcement Directorate representing the respondents.
2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:
(1) Offence of money laundering is an independent offence regarding process or activity connected with proceeds of crime which had been derived or obtained as a result of criminal activity relating t....
The petitioner must demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of arrest to be granted pre-arrest bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and compliance with summons issued under Section....
Detention of any person for enquiry whether amounts to arrest.
Point of law : An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is maintainable to quash proceedings which are ex facie bad for want of sanction, frivolous or in abuse of process of co....
The Enforcement Directorate's actions under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were deemed lawful, given the justified reason to believe that violations had occurred, affirming the legality of the s....
Possession of smuggled goods under the Customs Act confirms liability for prosecution without proper documentation; the accused must prove otherwise.
The court established that non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 19 of the PMLA regarding informing the accused of the grounds for arrest and the court's duty to record reasons fo....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
