Back
K. SURENDER, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Marepally Shyamalamma, W/o. Marepally Hanumaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. Surender, J.
1. This appeal is filed aggrieved by the judgment dated 16.10.2014 in S.C.No.180 of 2014, on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vikarabad, R.R. District.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
3. The appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment.
4. The allegation against the appellant/accused is that she had strangulated her grandson on 17.11.2013. P.W.1 is the husband of the appellant who filed telugu written complaint on 17.11.2013 stating that his daughter married earlier and her husband died by committing suicide. Thereafter she eloped with someone else. However, a child was born who was being taken care of by P.W. 1 and the appellant. The deceased boy was living in their house. On 17.11.2013, P.W.1 took his son Balraj to the hospital leaving the child in the house along with the appellant. On returning home at 12 noon, he found that the boy was dead. Thereafter, he went to the police Station around 7:00 p.m. and filed written complaint. The police investigated the case
Circumstantial evidence must be conclusive and leave no reasonable doubt for a conviction; suspicion alone is insufficient.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and the burden on the accused to explain circumstances surrounding th....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; suspicion alone is insufficient for conviction.
Circumstantial evidence must be cogent, definite, and form a complete chain to support a conviction.
Circumstantial evidence must satisfy strict principles to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants setting aside of conviction.
Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence requires a complete and coherent chain of events that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
Circumstantial evidence must conclusively point to the guilt of the accused without reasonable doubt for a conviction under murder charges.
The prosecution must establish circumstantial evidence linking the accused to a crime beyond reasonable doubt; suspicion alone is insufficient for conviction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
